Научный журнал ВолНЦ РАН (печатное издание)
29.12.202512.2025с 01.01.2025
Просмотры
Посетители
* - в среднем в день за текущий месяц
RuEn

рубрика "Социальное и экономическое развитие"

Гипотеза экологической кривой Филлипса для России: взаимосвязь между уровнями загрязнения окружающей среды и безработицы

Акин Ф., Озгюн Ф.

Том 18, №6, 2025

Акин Ф., Озгюн Ф. (2025). Гипотеза экологической кривой Филлипса для России: взаимосвязь между уровнями загрязнения окружающей среды и безработицы // Экономические и социальные перемены: факты, тенденции, прогноз. Т. 18. № 6. С. 227–247. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2025.6.102.11

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2025.6.102.11

Аннотация   |   Авторы   |   Список литературы
  1. Abbass K., Song H., Mushtaq Z., Khan F. (2022). Does technology innovation matter for environmental pollution? Testing the pollution halo/haven hypothesis for Asian countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(59), 89753–89771. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-21929-w
  2. Achuo E., Ojong N. (2025). Foreign direct investment, economic growth and environmental quality in Africa: Revisiting the pollution haven and environmental Kuznets curve hypotheses. Journal of Economic Studies, 52(4), 673–691. DOI: 10.1108/JES-02-2024-0065
  3. Adamowicz M. (2022). Green deal, green growth and green economy as a means of support for attaining the sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 14(10), 5901. DOI: 10.3390/su14105901
  4. Addison R., Akutcha E., Debrah G. (2024). Does the environmental Phillips curve hypothesis hold within the Ghanaian context? Scientific African, 26, e02400. DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02400
  5. Adhikari R., Niroula B., Singh S.K. (2024). Navigating Nepal’s economic growth and carbon emissions: Insights into the environmental Kuznets curve (EKC). Nature Environment and Pollution Technology, 23(3). DOI: 10.46488/NEPT.2024.v23i03.001
  6. Akaike H. (1979). A Bayesian extension of the minimum AIC procedure of autoregressive model fitting. Biometrika, 66(2), 237–242. DOI: 10.2307/2335654
  7. Al Numan A., Tahrim F., Esquivias M.A., Biswas M.K., Primanthi M.R. (2025). Testing the pollution haven and inverted N-shaped EKC hypotheses in the ASEAN Region: The impact of FDI and energy mix on environmental quality. Environmental and Sustainability Indicators, 100698. DOI: 10.1016/j.indic.2025.100698
  8. Ali M.U., Wang Y. (2024). Pollution haven or pollution halo? The role of global value chains in Belt and Road economies. Review of Development Economics, 28(1), 168–189. DOI: 10.1111/rode.13041
  9. Aliyev F., Eylasov N., Gasim N., Şahinler A.N. (2024). Impact of nuclear energy consumption on CO2 emissions in South Korea: Evidence from Fourier Bootstrap ARDL Bound test. Journal of Sustainable Development Issues, 2(1), 51–66. DOI: 10.62433/josdi.v2i1.23
  10. Amankwa R.F., Yiadom E.B., Acheampong E., Mawutor J.K. (2024). Climate change mitigation with Eurobonds: An Environmental Kuznets Curve analysis. Cogent Economics and Finance, 12(1), 2312782. DOI: 10.1080/23322039.2024.2312782
  11. Apergis N., Degirmenci T., Aydin M. (2023). Renewable and non-renewable energy consumption, energy technology investment, green technological innovation, and environmental sustainability in the United States: Testing the EKC and LCC hypotheses with novel Fourier estimation. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(60), 125570–125584. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-023-30901-1
  12. Ayad H., Djedaiet A. (2024). Does the unemployment rate matter for environmental issues in the G7 nations? New testing for the environmental Phillips curve using the load capacity factor. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–31. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-04956-0
  13. Azimi M.N., Rahman M.M. (2024). Examining the environmental Phillips curve hypothesis in G7 nations: Critical insights from wavelet coherence and wavelet causality analysis. Quality and Quantity, 1–31. DOI: 10.1007/s11135-024-01909-7
  14. Bagchi P., Sahu S.K. (2025). The conundrum of porter hypothesis, pollution haven hypothesis, and pollution halo hypothesis: Evidence from the Indian manufacturing sector. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 27(1), 205–217. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-024-02886-z
  15. Balla S.M.E., Lokonon B.O.K. (2024). Pollution haven or pollution halo: Evidence in forestry in developing countries. Journal of Forest Economics, 39(2), 187–204. DOI: 10.1561/112.00000577
  16. Becker R., Enders W., Lee J. (2006). A stationarity test in the presence of an unknown number of smooth breaks. Journal of Time Series Analysis, 27(3), 381–409. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9892.2006.00478.x
  17. Bhowmik R., Syed Q.R., Apergis N., Alola A.A., Gai Z. (2022). Applying a dynamic ARDL approach to the Environmental Phillips Curve (EPC) hypothesis amid monetary, fiscal, and trade policy uncertainty in the USA. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(10), 14914–14928. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-16716-y
  18. Biyase M., Kirsten F., Mbatha S., Ataro B. (2024). Remittance and carbon dioxide emissions in the Southern African Customs Union region: Is there a modified environmental Kuznets curve? Sustainable Futures, 8, 100315. DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100315
  19. Bozatlı O., Akça H. (2024). Does the composition of environmental regulation matter for ecological sustainability? Evidence from Fourier ARDL under the EKC and LCC hypotheses. Clean Technologies and Environmental Policy, 26, 4305–4323. DOI: 10.1007/s10098-024-02838-7
  20. Christopoulos D.K., León-Ledesma, M.A. (2010). Testing for Granger (non-) causality in a time-varying coefficient VAR model. Journal of Forecasting, 29(4), 436–453. DOI: 10.1002/for.1060
  21. Dar Y.A., Malik M.H., Rasool H. (2025). Exploring the load capacity factor and pollution haven hypothesis in India: Analyzing energy security risk and financial development in an asymmetric framework. Environmental Quality Management, 34(4), e70091. DOI: 10.1002/tqem.70091
  22. Daştan M., Eygü H. (2024). An empirical investigation of the link between economic growth, unemployment, and ecological footprint in Turkey: Bridging the EKC and EPC hypotheses. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(7), 18957–18988. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04106-y
  23. Dimanov D.K. (2024). Social and human costs of industrialization: A review of some negative effects on society during the first industrial revolution. Knowledge-International Journal, 62(1), 123–127.
  24. Dogaru L. (2020). The main goals of the fourth industrial revolution. renewable energy perspectives. Procedia Manufacturing, 46, 397–401. DOI: 10.1016/j.promfg.2020.03.058
  25. Durani F., Bhowmik R., Sharif A., Anwar A., Syed Q.R. (2023). Role of economic uncertainty, financial development, natural resources, technology, and renewable energy in the environmental Phillips curve framework. Journal of Cleaner Production, 420, 138334. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2023.138334
  26. Ekesiobi C., Emmanuel P.M., Mgbemena E. et al. (2025). Reconsidering the pollution haven hypothesis: An investigation of international trade, foreign direct investment, and carbon emission nexus in Nigeria. Journal of Chinese Economic and Business Studies, 23(2), 233–257. DOI: 10.1080/14765284.2024.2435227
  27. Enders W., Lee J. (2012). The flexible Fourier form and Dickey–Fuller type unit root tests. Economics Letters, 117(1), 196–199. DOI: 10.1016/j.econlet.2012.04.081
  28. Forson J.A. (2024). Public sector corruption, FDI and sustainable development in Africa: Does the pollution halo or haven hypothesis hold in Ghana? Scientific African, 26, e02442. DOI: 10.1016/j.sciaf.2024.e02442
  29. Gallant A.R., Souza G. (1991). Fitting flexible functional forms via semiparametric methods. Journal of Econometrics, 47(2–3), 269–290.
  30. Georgescu I., Kinnunen J. (2024). Dynamic interactions between GDP, renewable energy, innovation, and CO2 emissions in Finland: A Fourier-augmented ARDL analysis. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 17(1), 27. DOI: 10.1007/s12076-024-00391-x
  31. Gogoi N., Hussain F. (2024). Investigating the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis and pollution haven hypothesis in India: an ARDL approach. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 16(1), 16–44. DOI: 10.1504/IJSE.2024.135199
  32. Goh S.K., Yong J.Y., Lau C.C., Tang T.C. (2017). Bootstrap ARDL on energy-growth relationship for 22 OECD countries. Applied Economics Letters, 24(20), 1464–1467. DOI: 10.1080/13504851.2017.1284980
  33. Golkhandan A. (2024). Asymmetric effect of unemployment on load capacity factor (LCF) in selected MENA countries: Analysis of the environmental Phillips curve (EPC) hypothesis. New Economy and Trad, 19(64), 133–173. DOI: 10.30465/jnet.2025.49103.2145
  34. Grossman G.M., Krueger A.B. (1991). Environmental impacts of a North American free trade agreement. National Bureau of Economic Research, w3914. DOI: 10.3386/w3914
  35. Hacıimamoğlu T. (2023). A new approach to sustainable development: Analysis of the environmental Phillips curve hypothesis. Sosyoekonomi, 31(56), 11–25. DOI: 10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2023.02.01
  36. Holtbrügge D., Raghavan N. (2025). Environmental effects of foreign direct investment in India: Pollution haven or pollution halo? Critical Perspectives on International Business. DOI: 10.1108/cpoib-06-2024-0064
  37. Horobet A., Belascu L., Radulescu M. et al. (2024). Exploring the nexus between greenhouse emissions, environmental degradation and green energy in Europe: A critique of the environmental Kuznets curve. Energies, 17(20), 5109. DOI: 10.3390/en17205109
  38. Kashem M.A., Rahman M.M. (2020). Environmental Phillips curve: OECD and Asian NICs perspective. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27, 31153–31170. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-020-08620-8
  39. Khalid W., Nawaz A., Gadou L.M.A., Khan S.U., Aybudak H.G. (2025). Examining short-run and long-run nexus between economic growth, financial development, energy consumption and environmental degradation: Empirical evidence for the Environmental Kuznets Curve Hypothesis in Egypt. Asia-Pacific Journal of Regional Science, 1–33. DOI: 10.1007/s41685-025-00371-z
  40. Kinnunen J., Georgescu I., Nica I. (2024). Evaluating the environmental Phillips Curve hypothesis in the STIRPAT framework for Finland. Sustainability, 16(11), 4381. DOI: 10.3390/su16114381
  41. Kolasa-Wiecek A., Steinberga I., Pilarska A.A., Suszanowicz D., Wzorek M. (2024). Study of the environmental Kuznets curve in the EU27 countries taking into account socio-economic factors and GHG and PM emissions. Energies, 18(1), 68. DOI: 10.3390/en18010068
  42. Koyuncu Çakmak T., Beşer M.K., Alola A.A. (2025). Environmental effect of high-, upper, and lower middle-income economies’ energy mix: Is there a trade-off between unemployment and environmental quality? Energy and Environment, 36(2), 851–869. DOI: 10.1177/0958305X231187034
  43. Kumar N.N., Patel A. (2023). Modelling structural breaks in the tourism-led growth hypothesis. Current Issues in Tourism, 27(5), 701–709. DOI: 10.1080/13683500.2023.2245954
  44. Kumar P., Radulescu M., Sharma H., Belascu L., Serbu R. (2024). Pollution haven hypothesis and EKC dynamics: Moderating effect of FDI. A study in Shanghai Cooperation Organization countries. Environmental Research Communications, 6(11), 115032. DOI: 10.1088/2515-7620/ad9381
  45. Kuznets S. (1955). Economic growth and income inequality. The American Economic Review, 45(1), 1–28.
  46. Li H., Yang Z., Chen J. (2025). The impact of environmental pollution on China’s economic growth from the perspective of health damage. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1562342. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2025.1562342
  47. Lin M.C., Wu C.F. (2022). Transportation, environmental degradation, and health dynamics in the United States and China: Evidence from bootstrap ARDL with a Fourier function. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 907390. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.907390
  48. Magazzino C., Mele M., Drago C. et al. (2023). The trilemma among CO2 emissions, energy use, and economic growth in Russia. Scientific Reports, 13(1), 10225. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-37251-5
  49. McNown R., Sam C.Y., Goh S.K. (2018). Bootstrapping the autoregressive distributed lag test for cointegration. Applied Economics, 50(13), 1509–1521. DOI: 10.1080/00036846.2017.1366643
  50. Menegaki A.N., Türel M., Soylu Ö.B. (2025). The environmental impact of tourism in E7 economies: Testing the Environmental Kuznets Curve. Energy Sources, Part B: Economics, Planning, and Policy, 20(1), 2479180. DOI: 10.1080/15567249.2025.2479180
  51. Mishra M., Das D., Laurinavicius A., Laurinavicius A., Chang B.H. (2025). Sectorial analysis of foreign direct investment and trade openness on carbon emissions: A threshold regression approach. Journal of International Commerce, Economics and Policy, 16(01), 2550003. DOI: 10.1142/S1793993325500036
  52. Murshed M. (2025). The relevance of scaling technological innovation finances for evading the carbon curse of mineral resources: Insights from Latin America and the Caribbean. Mineral Economics, 38(1), 159–175. DOI: 10.1007/s13563-024-00466-7
  53. Naqvi R.A., Almohsen B., Sohail A. (2025). Modeling the environmental Kuznets Curve: A stochastic approach using economic and climate data. Journal of Environmental Management, 373, 123108. DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.123108
  54. Narayan P.K. (2005). The saving and investment nexus for China: Evidence from cointegration tests. Applied Economics, 37(17), 1979–1990. DOI: 10.1080/00036840500278103
  55. Nazir S. (2024). From curse to blessing: A Fourier-augmented ARDL analysis of agriculture, geopolitics, and trade in South and Central Asia. Letters in Spatial and Resource Sciences, 17(19). DOI: 10.1007/s12076-024-00384-w
  56. Nica I., Georgescu I., Kinnunen J. (2025). Economic growth, innovation, and CO2 emissions: Analyzing the environmental Kuznets curve and the innovation Claudia curve in BRICS countries. Sustainability, 17, 3507. DOI: 10.3390/su17083507
  57. Niu T., Wang P. (2024). The karmic debt of pollution haven hypothesis: Subnational environmental regulatory pressure and foreign divestment from an emerging market. Journal of International Marketing, 32(2), 33–48. DOI: 10.1177/1069031X231196254
  58. Odei S.A., Dunyo S.K., Anderson H.J. (2025). Research and development, economic growth, CO2 emissions and environmental Kuznets curve. Sustainable Futures, 9, 100541. DOI: 10.1016/j.sftr.2025.100541
  59. Osuntuyi B.V., Lean H.H. (2023). Environmental degradation, economic growth, and energy consumption: The role of education. Sustainable Development, 31(2), 1166-1177. DOI: 10.1002/sd.2480
  60. Padhan L., Bhat S. (2024). Pollution haven or pollution halo in the context of emerging economies: A two-step system GMM approach. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 1–21. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-024-05616-z
  61. Pesaran M.H., Shin Y., Smith R.J. (2001). Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 16(3), 289–326. Available at: https://www.jstor.org/stable/2678547
  62. Philbeck T., Davis N. (2018). The fourth industrial revolution. Journal of International Affairs, 72(1), 17–22.
  63. Porto N., Ciaschi M., Pitetti D., Camilletti C., Dal Bianco J. (2025). Tourism, exports, and the environmental Kuznets curve: New evidence from Latin America with implications for sustainable tourism. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1–21. DOI: 10.1080/09669582.2025.2484307
  64. Rabbi M.F., Abdullah M. (2024). Fossil fuel CO2 emissions and economic growth in the Visegrád region: A study based on the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis. Climate, 12(8), 115. DOI: 10.3390/cli12080115
  65. Rayhan I., Al Nahian M.A., Siddika A. (2020). Re-evaluating the environmental Kuznets curve and environmental Phillips curve in Bangladesh: An augmented ARDL bounds test approach with a structural break. The Jahangirnagar Economic Review, 31, 109–134.
  66. Sahin G., Naimoglu M., Kavaz I., Sahin A. (2025). Examining the environmental Phillips curve hypothesis in the ten most polluting emerging economies: Economic dynamics and sustainability. Sustainability, 17(3), 920. DOI: 10.3390/su17030920
  67. Sam C.Y., McNown R., Goh S.K. (2019). An augmented autoregressive distributed lag bounds test for cointegration. Economic Modelling, 80, 130–141. DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2018.11.001
  68. Shang L., Xu P. (2022). Can carbon emission regulation achieve a dual target of low carbon and employment? An empirical analysis based on China’s provincial panel data. Frontiers in Energy Research, 10, 926443. DOI: 10.3389/fenrg.2022.926443
  69. Shastri S., Mohapatra G., Giri A.K. (2023). The Environmental Philips Curve from a gender perspective: Empirical evidence from India. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(7), 17487–17496. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-022-23336-7
  70. Smolovic S., Zivanovic S., Abramovic N., Zivanovic M. (2023). Management of sustainable development and environmental protection. Agora International Journal of Economical Sciences, 17(2), 142–157. DOI: 10.15837/aijes.v17i2.6452%0A
  71. Soti N., Kumar A., Gupta S., Batra V. (2024). Divergence or convergence: Trade globalization, regulatory and environmental quality in QUAD countries – a robust ARDL and decoupling index inquiry. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 35(7), 1650–1670. DOI: 10.1108/MEQ-10-2023-0374
  72. Sreenu N. (2025). Analysing FDI inflow effects on CO2 emissions: A comparative study of OECD and BRICS nations with PHH and PHE models. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 19(1), 80–100. DOI: 10.1108/IJESM-02-2024-0006
  73. Syed Q.R., Apergis N., Goh S.K. (2023). The dynamic relationship between climate policy uncertainty and renewable energy in the US: Applying the novel Fourier augmented autoregressive distributed lags approach. Energy, 278, 127383. DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2023.127383
  74. Tanveer A., Song H., Faheem M., Chaudhry I.S. (2022). Validation of environmental Philips curve in Pakistan: A fresh insight through ARDL technique. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 1–18. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-17099-w
  75. Tariq S., Mehmood U., Ul Haq Z., Mariam A. (2022). Exploring the existence of environmental Philips curve in South Asian countries. Environmental science and pollution research, 29(23), 35396–35407. DOI: 10.1007/s11356-021-18099-6
  76. Wang Q., Li Y., Li R. (2024). Rethinking the environmental Kuznets curve hypothesis across 214 countries: The impacts of 12 economic, institutional, technological, resource, and social factors. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications, 11(1), 1–19. DOI: 10.1057/s41599-024-02736-9
  77. Winter J. (2024). A historical perspective review of the environmental pollution. Science Insights, 44(2), 1253–1261. DOI: 10.15354/si.24.re916
  78. Wu C.F., Chang T., Wu T.P. et al. (2022). Impact of globalization on the environment in major CO2-emitting countries: Evidence using bootstrap ARDL with a Fourier function. Frontiers in Public Health, 10, 907403. DOI: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.907403
  79. Yavuz E., Kilic E., Caglar A.E. (2024). A new hypothesis for the unemployment-environment dilemma: Is the environmental Phillips curve valid in the framework of load capacity factor in Turkiye? Environment, Development and Sustainability, 26(11), 29475–29492. DOI: 10.1007/s10668-023-04258-x
  80. Yilanci V., Bozoklu S., Gorus M.S. (2020). Are BRICS countries pollution havens? Evidence from a bootstrap ARDL bounds testing approach with a Fourier function. Sustainable Cities and Society, 55, 102035. DOI: 10.1016/j.scs.2020.102035

Полная версия статьи