VolRC RAS scientific journal
RuEn

Journal section "Environmental economics"

Developing a Model of Forest Enterprises Activities with the Prospect of Moving into Sustainable Development

Medvedev S.O., Zyryanov M.A.

Volume 17, Issue 2, 2024

Medvedev S.O., Zyryanov M.A. (2024). Developing a model of forest enterprises activities with the prospect of moving into sustainable development. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 17(2), 129–145. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.2.92.7

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2024.2.92.7

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Blam Yu.Sh., Mashkina L.V., Stoylova A.S. (2017). Detalizaciya prognozov po narodnohozyaystvennoy modeli v naturalnye pokazateli otraslevoy modeli (na primere lesnogo kompleksa) // Ekonomika i upravlenie innovaciyami. № 2. S. 66–77.
  2. Bobylev S.N. (2020). Ustoychivoe razvitie: novoe videnie buduschego? // Voprosy politicheskoy ekonomii. № 1. S. 67–83.
  3. Budanov I.A. (2016). Problemy perehoda ot proizvodstvennoy k vosproizvodstvennoy modeli ekonomicheskogo razvitiya Rossii // Nauchnye trudy: Institut narodnohozyaystvennogo prognozirovaniya RAN. T. 14. S. 37–64.
  4. Butko G.P., Porotnikov P.A., Tihonov E.D. (2013). Formirovanie sistemy upravleniya konkurentosposobnostyu predpriyatiy lesnoy promyshlennosti // Lesnoy vestnik. № 4. S. 165–168.
  5. Glazyrina I.P., Faleychik L.M., Yakovleva K.A. (2015). Socialno-ekonomicheskaya effektivnost i «zelenyy» rost regionalnogo lesopolzovaniya // Geografiya i prirodnye resursy. № 4. S. 17–25.
  6. Gordeev R.V., Pyzhev A.I. (2023). Lesnaya promyshlennost Rossii v usloviyah sankciy: poteri i novye vozmozhnosti // Voprosy ekonomiki. № 4. S. 45–66.
  7. Grigorev I.V., Grigoreva O.I. (2016). Effektivnost lesopolzovaniya v Rossii // Energiya: ekonomika, tehnika, ekologiya. № 5. S. 24–30.
  8. Izmaylova M.A. (2021). Ustoychivoe razvitie kak novaya sostavlyayuschaya korporativnoy socialnoy otvetstvennosti // MIR (Modernizaciya. Innovacii. Razvitie). T. 12. № 2. S. 100–113.
  9. Ilina E.A. (2021). Modelirovanie strategii ustoychivogo razvitiya promyshlennyh predpriyatiy // Organizator proizvodstva. T. 29. № 3. S. 130–138.
  10. Koryakov A.G. (2012). Metodicheskie podhody k modelirovaniyu ustoychivogo razvitiya promyshlennyh predpriyatiy // Vestnik ekonomiki, prava i sociologii. № 3. S. 36–40.
  11. Medvedev S.O., Mohirev A.P., Gerasimova M.M. (2020). Modeli optimizacii vypuska produkcii i vyruchki lesopromyshlennyh predpriyatiy v usloviyah ustoychivogo razvitiya // Fundamentalnye issledovaniya. № 7. S. 59–63.
  12. Petrov A.P. (2020). Industrializacii lesovosstanovleniya nuzhna novaya pravovaya i ekonomicheskaya organizaciya // Ustoychivoe lesopolzovanie. № 3 (62). S. 5–6.
  13. Petrov V.N., Myakshin V.N., Pesyakova T.N. (2023). Metodika ocenki effektivnosti regionalnoy investicionnoy politiki subektov Rossiyskoy Federacii // Ekonomika regiona. № 19 (1). S. 259–273. DOI: 10.17059/ekon.reg.2023-1-20
  14. Polyanskaya O.A., Mihaylova A.E., Zasenko V.E. (2017). Ekologizaciya proizvodstva kak osnova konkurentosposobnosti predpriyatiy lesopromyshlennogo kompleksa // Peterburgskiy ekonomicheskiy zhurnal. № 3. S. 76–84.
  15. Pyzhev A.I. (2021). Issledovaniya ekonomiki lesnogo kompleksa Rossii: bibliometricheskiy analiz // Terra Economicus. T. 19. № 1. S. 63–77. DOI: 10.18522/2073-6606-2021-19-1-63-77
  16. Rogulin R.S. (2021). Model ocenki effektivnosti formirovaniya lesopromyshlennymi predpriyatiyami ustoychivyh cepochek postavok syrya // Journal of Applied Economic Research. T. 20. № 1. S. 148–168.
  17. Terenteva V.D., Savchenko E.E. (2022). Razvitie «zelenoy» ekonomiki v LPK regionov Sibiri // Baikal Research Journal. T. 13. № 1. DOI: 10.17150/2411-6262.2022.13(1).16
  18. Sheluhina E.A. (2014). Balansovye makroekonomicheskie i mikroekonomicheskie matematicheskie modeli ekologo-ekonomicheskih otnosheniy v ramkah ustoychivogo razvitiya // Ekonomicheskiy analiz: teoriya i praktika. № 14 (365). S. 20–31.
  19. Yan Sh. (2018). Povyshenie effektivnosti deyatelnosti lesopromyshlennyh predpriyatiy na territorii Rossiyskoy Federacii // Sistemy. Metody. Tehnologii. № 1 (37). S. 130–135.
  20. Yarullina G.R. (2008). Modelirovanie sbalansirovannogo rosta v obespechenii ustoychivogo razvitiya predpriyatiya // Vestnik Kazanskogo gosudarstvennogo finansovo-ekonomicheskogo instituta. № 1 (10). S. 60–64.
  21. Amaral C., Pedro M.I., Ferreira D.C., Marques R.C. (2022). Performance and its determinants in the Portuguese municipal solid waste utilities. Waste Management, 139, 70–87. DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2021.12.020
  22. Chang A.-Y., Cheng Y.-T. (2019). Analysis model of the sustainability development of manufacturing small and medium-sized enterprises in Taiwan. Journal of Cleaner Production, 207, 458–473. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.025
  23. Gadow K.V. (2000). Evaluating risk in forest planning models. Silva Fennica, 34(2). DOI: 10.14214/sf.639
  24. Hahn A., Knoke T. (2010). Sustainable development and sustainable forestry: Analogies, differences, and the role of flexibility. European Journal of Forest Research, 129(5), 787–801. DOI: 10.1007/s10342-010-0385-0
  25. Hahn A., Härtl F., Irland L., Kohler C., Moshammer R., Knoke T. (2014). Financially optimized management planning under risk aversion results in even-flow sustained timber yield. Forest Policy and Economics, 42, 30–41. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2014.02.002
  26. Halonen M., Näyhä A., Kuhmonen I. (2022). Regional sustainability transition through forest-based bioeconomy? Development actors’ perspectives on related policies, power, and justice. Forest Policy and Economics, 142. DOI: 10.1016/j.forpol.2022.102775
  27. Hu D., Wang Y., Huang J., Huang H. (2017) How do different innovation forms mediate the relationship between environmental regulation and performance? Journal of Cleaner Production, 161, 466–476.
  28. Ibrahim M., Ferreira D., Daneshvar S., Marques R. (2019). Transnational resource generativity: Efficiency analysis and target setting of water, energy, land, and food nexus for OECD countries. Science of the Total Environment, 697. DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.134017
  29. Laso et al. (2018). Assessing energy and environmental efficiency of the Spanish agri-food system using the LCA/DEA methodology. Energies, 11(12). DOI: 10.3390/en11123395
  30. Liang Y., Jin X., Taghvaee V. (2024). Sustainable development spillover effects among selected Asian countries: Analysis of integrated sustainability perspective. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 91. DOI: 10.1016/j.seps.2023.101781
  31. Medvedev S.O., Zyryanov M.A., Mokhirev A.P. et al. (2022). Russian timber industry: Current situation and modelling of prospects for wood biomass use. International Journal of Design and Nature and Ecodynamics, 17(5), 745–752.
  32. Mourao P.R., Martinho V.D. (2020). Forest entrepreneurship: A bibliometric analysis and a discussion about the co-authorship networks of an emerging scientific field. Journal of Cleaner Production, 256. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120413
  33. Niero M., Hauschild M.Z., Hoffmeyer S.B., Olsen S.I. (2017). Combining eco‐efficiency and eco‐effectiveness for continuous loop beverage packaging systems: Lessons from the Carlsberg circular community. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 21(3), 742–753 DOI: 10.1111/jiec.12554
  34. Porter M.E., Linde C.V.D. (1995). Toward a new conception of the environment competitiveness relationship. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9(4), 97–118.
  35. Soviana S. (2015). Cooperative, social enterprise, and community-based enterprise: Competing, substituting, or complementing? Management and Organizational Studies, 2(2), 1–14. DOI: 10.5430/mos.v2n2p1
  36. Stern N.H. (2007). The Economics of Climate Change: The Stern Review. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  37. Xue H. et al. (2018). Reform and efficiency of state-owned forest enterprises in Northeast China as “social firms”. Journal of Forest Economics, 30, 18–33. DOI: 10.1016/j.jfe.2018.02.002

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today: