VolRC RAS scientific journal
RuEn

Journal section "Environmental economics"

Identifying the Effect of Decoupling in Major Economic Sectors of the Komi Republic

Fomina V.F.

Volume 15, Issue 1, 2022

Fomina V.F. (2022). Identifying the effect of decoupling in major economic sectors of the Komi Republic. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 15(1), 176–193. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.1.79.9

DOI: 10.15838/esc.2022.1.79.9

Abstract   |   Authors   |   References
  1. Akulov A.O. (2014). Regional environmental impacts of coal industry and development prospects according to a decoupling model. Region: ekonomika i sotsiologiya= Region: Economics and Sociology, 1(81), 272–288 (in Russian).
  2. Bleischwitz R. (2010). International economics and economic policy. Relevance, measurement, empirical trends, innovation, resource policies. Special issue on “The International Economics of Resources and Resource Policy” (Springer Publisher), 7(2–3), 227–244. DOI: 10.1007/s10368-010-0170-z
  3. Bobylev S.N., Mikhailova S.M., Kiryushin A.P. et. al. (2019). Zelenaya ekonomika i tseli ustoichivogo razvitiya dlya Rossii [Green Economy and the Sustainable Development Goals for Russia]. Moscow: MSU Faculty of Economics.
  4. Bringezu S., Ramaswami A., Schandl H., O’Brien M. et al. (2017). Аssessing global resource use: A systems approach to resource efficiency and pollution reduction. In: A Report of the International Resource Panel. UNEP, Nairobi, Kenya. Available at: https://www.resourcepanel.org/ reports/assessing-global-resource-use.pdf (accessed: May 12, 2020).
  5. Eisenmenger N. et al. (2020). The sustainable development goals prioritize economic growth over sustainable resource use: A critical refection on the SDGs from a socio ecological perspective. Sustainability Science, 15, 1101–1110. DOI: 10.1007/s11625-020-00813-x
  6. Finel N., Tapio P. (2012) Decoupling transport CO2 from GDP, Finland futures research center. University of Turku, 11–12. Available at: https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/147511eBook_2012-1.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (accessed: April 12, 2021).
  7. Haberl H. et al. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part II: Synthesizing the insights. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6). DOI: 10.1088/1748-9326/ab842a
  8. Hertwich E., Lifset R., Pauliuk S., Heeren N. (2020). Resource efficiency and climate change: Material efficiency strategies for a low-carbon future. In: A report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme, Nairobi, Kenya. Available at: https://www.resourcepanel.
  9. Jackson T. (2017). Protsvetanie bez rosta: Osnovy ekonomiki budushchego [Prosperity without Growth: Foundations for the Economy of Tomorrow]. Moscow: Ast-Press.
  10. Kozhevnikov S.A., Lebedeva M.A. (2019). Problems of transition to green economy in the region (Based on materials of the European North of Russia). Problemy razvitiya territorii=Problems of Territory’s Development, 4(102), 72–88. DOI: 10.15838/ptd.2019.4.102.4 (in Russian).
  11. Krausmann F. et al. (2017). Material flow accounting: Measuring global material use for sustainable development. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 42, 647–675. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-environ-102016-060726.
  12. Oberle B., Bringezu S., Hatfield-Dodds S., Hellweg S., Schandl H., Clement J. et al. (2019). Global resources outlook 2019: Natural resources for the future we want. In: Report of the International Resource Panel. United Nations Environment Programme. Nairobi, Kenya. Available at: https://www.resourcepanel.org/reports/global-resources-outlook (accessed: May 10, 2020).
  13. Parrique T. et al. (2019). Decoupling debunked – Evidence and arguments against green growth as a sole strategy for sustainability. European Environmental Bureau.
  14. Shkiperova G.T. (2014). Analysis and modeling of relationship between economic growth and environmental quality (The case of the Republic of Karelia). Ekonomicheskii analiz: teoriya i praktika=Economic Analysis: Theory and Practice, 43(394), 41–49 (in Russian).
  15. Stocker A., Gerold S., Hinterberger F. et al. (2015). Тhe interaction of resource and labour productivity. A scoping study. Sustainable Europe Research Institute (SERI). Available at: https://ec.europa.eu/environment/enveco/growth_jobs_social/pdf/studies/Scientific%20background%20Resource%20labour%20productivity.pdf (accessed: May 12, 2021).
  16. Tapio P. (2005). Towards a theory of decoupling: Degrees of decoupling in the EU and the case of road traffic in Finland between 1970 and 2001. Transport Policy, 12(2), 137–151. Available at: doi.10.1016/j.tranpol.2005.01.001
  17. Tret’yakova E.A. (2019). Environmental intensity of economic growth in the Baltic Sea region. Baltiiskii region=The Baltic Region, 11(1), 14–28. DOI: 10.5922/2079-8555-2019-1-2 (in Russian).
  18. Vadén Т. et al. (2020). Decoupling for ecological sustainability: A categorisation and review of research literature. Environmental Science & Policy, 112, 236–244. DOI: 10.1016/j.envsci.2020.06.016
  19. Vehmas J, Kaivo-oja J, Luukkanen J. (2003). Global Trends of Linking Environmental Stress and Economic Growth. Turku: Finland Futures Research Centre, Available at: https://www.utupub.fi/bitstream/handle/10024/147391/Tutu_2003-7.pdf?sequence=1 (accessed: May 12, 2021).
  20. Ward J.D. et al. (2016). Is decoupling GDP growth from environmental impact possible? PLoS ONE, 11(10): e0164733. Available at: doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0164733
  21. Wiedenhofer D. et al. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: Bibliometric and conceptual mapping. Environmental Research Letters, 15(6). Available at: doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8429
  22. Wiedmann T., Lenzen M. et al. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11, 3107. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16941-yе
  23. Yashalova N.N. (2014). Analysis of the decoupling effect in ecological and economic activity of a region. Regional’naya ekonomika: teoriya i praktika=Regional Economics: Theory and Practice, 39, 55–61 (in Russian).
  24. Zabelina I.A. (2019). Decoupling in environmental and economic development of regions-participants of cross-border cooperation. Ekonomicheskie i sotsial’nye peremeny: fakty, tendentsii, prognoz=Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 12(1), 241–255. DOI: 10.15838/esc.2019.1.61.15 (in Russian).
  25. Wiedenhofer D. et al. (2020). A systematic review of the evidence on decoupling of GDP, resource use and GHG emissions, part I: Bibliometric and conceptual mapping. Environmental Research Letters, 15 (6). Available at: doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/ab8429
  26. Wiedmann T., Lenzen M. et al. (2020). Scientists’ warning on affluence. Nature Communications, 11, 3107. DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16941-ye

Article views

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

Article downloads

all: , this year: , this month: , today:

View full article